![]() Before Resolve 15, Fusion standalone was the only way to get Fusion. The only difference is that in Resolve Studio, you get access to some more nodes, like PlanarTracker, CameraTracker, OpticalFlow, SphericalStabilizer, and some others.įusion Studio is the standalone version of Fusion - a separate application. Available in both Resolve free and Resolve Studio. The Fusion in the Fusion page is Resolve Fusion. But, but when you upgrade to DaVinci Resolve Studio, is the Fusion in the Fusion tab, Fusion Studio?No. My guess is the next iMac will increase the GPU horsepower enough to get effects such as (light) Noise Reduction and Film Grain consistently playing back in real time.ĭgbarar wrote:Understood. The time and storage space I will save not having to transcode is worth losing a few realtime effects. My big-ass workstation stutters when playing forward, and forget scrubbing backwards. I work a lot with 8K h.265 footage from a Sony A1, and I can scrub it like it is ProRes. It's wild, huh? Those dedicated cores for video decoding work a charm. It does not get throttled when I plug it off, only the screen dims a bit automatically (but, of course, can be increased again). Those two last points are very different from all laptops with enough power for DR I have ever used. It's not really getting hot, highest core temperature is 81 degrees, the fans are still very quiet at about 2/3 of the speed. CPU-cores are at less than 50% load, the GPUs at about 75%. Of course, there's no swapping going on with DR only. RAW-decoding is at full resolution, no cache or anything to make it easier. I put CineMatch on one node, then two primaries and one secondary node. Canon RAW is known to be hard on resources. Just got some footage in Canon RAW 8K 25 fps and threw it into an UHD timeline. Uli Plank wrote:Well, I went for the 16" version with the M1 'Pro' and 32 GB RAM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |